Land Acquisition Fund ambassador Arjan Dwarshuis supports nature
16 December, 2024
Tuesday 30 april 2024
Header photo: A woman fishing at a lake near Kuntang, Central Sulawesi (c) Stephanie Broekarts / IUCN NL
Under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), large companies have to carry out research in their upstream and downstream value chain on (potential) negative impacts they have on human rights and the environment. They must prevent, mitigate or stop these negative impacts. Negative impacts include, for example, slavery, child labour, labour exploitation, but also loss of biodiversity, pollution and the destruction of natural heritage.
Reaching agreement on the CSDDD was not without struggle. Unfortunately, the outcome of months of negotiations is not optimal for people and nature. For instance, the scope of the directive has been limited by adjusting the definition of ‘downstream value chain’ to exclude activities surrounding product disposal. This means that, for example, the negative impacts of recycling or landfills need not be investigated. Furthermore, the directive is being phased in, meaning that it will only apply in 5 years to companies that employ 1,000 people and generate a turnover of 450 million; this is only 0.05% of the total number of companies in Europe [1]source: SOMO data Orbis & Eurostat via Corporate Justice.
Also, due to lobbying by the financial sector, the directive only applies to financial institutions to a very limited extent. ‘This is a missed opportunity, because it is precisely the financial sector that can play an important positive role via conditionality in providing financing. After all, they can demand that companies improve their respect for human rights and the environment,’ says Antoinette Sprenger, senior expert Environmental Justice at IUCN NL.
But the CSDD also has good elements:
In terms of damage to the environment, a company is only liable if this damage to the environment also leads to negative impacts on human well-being. This is disappointing, because although this will often be the case, causing damage to the environment should lead to liability even without human impact. Fortunately, the Environmental Crime Directive offers some relief in this regard. However, this is a criminal procedure that cannot be initiated by, for example, civil society.
Official adoption of the CSDDD by the European Council will take place at the end of May, after which the directive will enter into force 20 days later. The Netherlands will then have two years to implement this directive into Dutch law. There is already a proposed bill, so this deadline is easily achievable for the Netherlands.
IUCN NL advocates at national and international level for better laws and regulations that prevent companies from damaging human rights, the environment and the climate. We do this as part of our Forests for a Just Future and Bottom Line programmes, whose goals include ensuring the freedom of movement and safety of environmental defenders and protecting nature.
↑1 | source: SOMO data Orbis & Eurostat via Corporate Justice |
---|